TURKEY: REVERSE DECISION REGARDING SYRIAC PROPERTIES IN TURABDIN

As reported firstly by weekly Agos newspaper on June, 22, Syriac churches, cemeteries and other properties had been seized by the Turkish state Treasury and some of them transferred to the Religious Affairs Directorate, Diyanet.

This outrageous and illegal seizure of Syriac properties including historical churches, monasteries and other assets are integral part of the social, cultural, historical, religious and architectural fabric of the whole region and not only for Syriac people but for the whole people of the region.

Turabdin region is historical homeland of Syriac people by preserving ancient and unique traditions by building monuments, monasteries, churches and other valuable architectural sites in the region. From thousands years of history until today, Syriac people preserved their homeland from attacks, harassments and foreigners. Today, with massive seizure of Syriac monasteries, churches and other assets, Syriac people face another existentialist challenge to overcome this unjust decision by the Turkish state and affiliate departments.

We in ECPM and ESU, from the first moment of the issue until now took this issue with urgent matter and a priority taken necessary contacts and relations in Turkey, Europe and in United Sates of America. We are determined to follow this issue with great attention. There is only one way for the ending this unfair decision; Turkey must immediately reverse decision and gives back these historical properties to the Syriac people.

EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN POLITICAL MOVEMENT, ECPM

EUROPEAN SYRIAC UNION, ESU

Gallery

Click on image for larger view


 MRG-GAL-6667
Download High Res This file may be low resolution. Please check before using it for print
Download Low Res

< back 

Date: 28/06/2017

Countries:

Turkey

No associated categories
This website has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union.
The contents of this website are the sole responsibility of Minority Rights Group International and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union
.